Archive for the ‘Nerd stuff’ Category

Just a warning….

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Aug 16 2010

I <3 Linux… but sometimes I don’t really understand it…..

Aug 15 20:04:16 idpmgt kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU
0.
Aug 15 20:04:16 idpmgt kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
Aug 15 20:04:16 idpmgt kernel: Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
Aug 15 20:04:19 idpmgt kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU
0.
Aug 15 20:04:19 idpmgt kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
Aug 15 20:04:19 idpmgt kernel: Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel: Uninitialised timer!
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel: This is just a warning.  Your computer is OK
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel: function=0xc012a46e, data=0xf0e85330
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c0129a20>] check_timer_failed+0x3c/0×58
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c012a46e>] process_timeout+0×0/0×5
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c0129c7d>] del_timer+0×12/0×65
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c0129d74>] del_singleshot_timer_sync+0×8/0×21
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c02d0e66>] schedule_timeout+0xda/0xee
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c012a46e>] process_timeout+0×0/0×5
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c0120129>] add_wait_queue+0×12/0×30
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c0134e11>] futex_wait+0×133/0×194
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c011e71b>] default_wake_function+0×0/0xc
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c011e71b>] default_wake_function+0×0/0xc
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c02d304c>] common_interrupt+0×18/0×20
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c01350c2>] do_futex+0×29/0x5a
Aug 15 20:04:26 idpmgt kernel:  [<c01351f4>] sys_futex+0×101/0x10c

Immediately after saying “Just a warning, everything is okay”… the computer locked and had to be power cycled.  OOPS!

State of the gaming industry

Games, Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Nov 02 2009

To quote Mr. Horse (Ren & Stimpy)… “No sir, I don’t like it!”

In the past few years, PC and console gaming have become truly big business.  Game companies are no longer run by people who are gamers at heart, but instead by businessmen motivated by stockholders and greed.  (This means you, Bobby Kotick).  Things have gotten out of hand with “Limited Edition” or “Collectors Edition” or “Limited Collectors Editions” as I pointed out in a previous blog about the Modern Warfare 2 and the working night vision goggles included with “Prestige Edition” games.  These were neat in the past… perhaps a glimpse into the development with a “Making of” DVD, or an art book detailing the early sketches of the characters and environments.  After that it progressed to “display case knick-knacks” like coins in Oblivion, or die-cast figures.  Then it got ridiculous with helmets and night vision goggles.  But through all of it, it was all essentially random junk that you really didn’t need.

And then came Forza.  While there may be other games that do it, Forza is the one that I’m most aware of.  Forza 2 had a Limited Collectors Edition that included exclusive cars that you could only unlock if you bought the LCE.  The problem with that was, it wasn’t sold in America.  Americans got TOTALLY screwed out of cars that were on their install media, but couldn’t be played since we had not shelled out more money.  The tradition continued with Forza 3 which had exclusive cars that were, once again, included on the physical media we paid $60 for… but could only be unlocked through the LCE, which was actually  sold in America this time… but only at GameStop.   At the point when it becomes about exclusive game content, especially game content that exists on our DVDs, but is unusable… I take offense to the idea of collectors editions.

Move onto the consolization of of the PC world, as I’ll call it.  Modern Warfare 2 was a sure-fire hit for Infinity Ward.  Call of Duty 4 was a killer game and a must-have, and the sequel was sure to be even better…. until Oct 17th.  On Oct 17th, community manager “fourzerotwo” dropped the bombshell on the PC community that our tried-and-true dedicated server model was being tossed out for an Xbox Live style “IW.Net” implemented through peer-to-peer servers.  Dedicated servers have been around since the days of Quake and Quakeworld… and have worked damn well through that period of time.  Dedicated servers build communities of players who come together either as competitive clans, or simply as a gaming community who make friends and play together frequently on the same server or group of servers.  Think of it as your local playground, where you can walk down to the basketball court and typically find the same people hanging around playing or waiting for a 3-on-3 pickup game.  Even better, you can join a game in progress, even if it’s already 20 vs 20, as soon as you show up.  The IW.Net/Xbox Live models require P2P serving, joining lobbies, setting up a game beforehand, and playing to completion.  Once that’s done, you sit in the lobby and organize another game.  The P2P aspect hosting off of residential connections will also limit the number of people who can participate to a small group, unlike the 48+ player servers in Call of Duty 4 or 64 player servers in Battlefield 2.

Along with IW.Net destroying the existing modus operandi of PC gaming, IW/Activision saw fit to jack the price up on us to console prices.  The pricepoint for most PC games has been $50 or below for a while now.  Xbox 360 and PS3 games are typically $60 due to licensing fees paid to Microsoft and Sony to publish on their platforms.  Now we’re expected to pay the console prices for a PC game… and quite likely pay for downloadable content since the removal of dedicated servers removed the ability of the community to create and share maps, a LONGSTANDING standard in PC gaming.

And while we’re on milking customers for money with a broken system that nobody asked for, there’s Monte Cristo’s city-builder Cities XL.  Cities XL was a game with great potential, a spiritual successor to the aging but fun SimCity 4 which promised to not flop as horribly as SimCity Societies had.  Unfortunately, MC got greedy during development and decided to merge the genre with MMOs, which lead to a game that’s confused about what it’s supposed to be and customers that are even more confused.  The “Planet Offer” mode (the MMO mode) features online city building with… a chat room.  That’s basically it, at the moment.  Cities in Cities XL can trade commodities with other cities.  Some cities lack oil, others lack water, and you can buy and sell “tokens” on the in-game free market.  That works in Planet Offer mode… somewhat.  The game is still experiencing its glitches with it.  There are promises of additional content available only to PO subscribers in the future, but no timeline on when that will actually be delivered.  But what about those that don’t want to pay for the PO, as we were promised we would be able to.  We’re left with a botched single player game with trading limited to an in-game trader that has a 1-4 buy to sell ratio, effectively killing the ability to build large or specialized cities due to the inability to acquire goods at a reasonable price, and without even the option to purchase the additonal content for offline play in the future.  Pay us constantly, and when you stop paying us, your game reverts back to what it was on day 1.

All in all, gaming is moving away from its roots.  It has become too much of a big money business, and many developers are looking at us not as a community, not as peers as they once did, and not even as customers… but only as cash cows waiting to be milked for more of the green stuff.

Shoretel programmers are Yankees fans

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Mar 27 2009

While poking around at a Shoretel phone this morning looking for a way other than the web interface to reboot it, a co-worker and I saw this spit out in the debugging information from a call.

Setting VoiceStats interval to 10 seconds
processCmdQ: EPTCMD_ATTACH_DEVICE
streamDevAttach: devId 0 streamId 0
HDSP: PVE Codec for VHD 80 encoder rate change to G.711 u-law 64 kbps no VAD
HDSP: endpt 80 mode change event op1:2 op2:0

addAttDev: store devId 0 to streamId 0 list
processCmdQ: EPTCMD_MODIFY_STREAM
streamModify: Derek (Max)Jeter = 50<– Go Yankees!!!

streamModify: streamId=0 mode=txrx jitterMin=0 jitterMax=50 jitterTarget=0

HDSP: PVE Codec for VHD 80 decoder rate change to G.711 u-law 64 kbps
HDSP: PVE Codec for VHD 80 new frame size: 20 ms

Not sure who is the bigger nerd… the programmer for putting it there, or us for finding it.

Adobe is the new Real

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Mar 09 2009

I remember the earlier days of the internet, when Real Player got a nasty reputation by trying to take over every aspect of your system.  People hated it, it was widely panned, and to this day some people (me) still avoid anything even remotely related to Real Media.

Well Adobe seems to be joining them in the “take over your computer” category.  The past few versions of Adobe Acrobat reader have been bloated and slow, and the only thing they seem to do efficiently is pop up boxes asking you if you want to update.  If you click the “Do not ask me again” box, it does the only logical thing an unruly update client can possibly do… and asks every single time you start the software.  YAY!

And now, I find another annoyance.  I’m working on a co-worker’s computer that she thinks is infected with AntiVirus 2009.  I don’t want to hook it to my network, so I put Malware Bytes and the latest update for it on a thumb drive, pop it in the USB port on her laptop, and….. Adobe Photo Downloader.  No asking, just the downloader.  I close it, hit My Computer, and…. my drive isn’t there.  So I unplug it, plug it in again, and once more… Adobe Photo Downloader shows up, and my thumb drive isn’t assigned a drive letter.  Eventually I found the system tray icon for Adobe Photo Downloader, killed it, and unplugged/plugged the thumb drive again.  Low and behold… there’s my drive letter.

I’m probably just too easily annoyed at things like this, but one of my pet peeves is software hijacking a computer and preventing “normal” operation.  And given Acrobat’s increasing bloat, I can only recommend using something else…. ANYTHING else.  I would suggest Foxit, but they have a lame payment/advertising systemthat I don’t agree with and won’t link to.  If you can get past that, or can live with what their free version has to offer, give it a shot.

It’s true… attack ads CAN sway votes

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Oct 21 2008

This one has pretty well cemented the fact that I’ll be voting for Kay Hagan.

Toner scammers

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Jul 17 2008

Is it just me, or is this scam getting more prevalent over the past year or so?  In the last month, I’ve had two of these bastards call me.  Typically, my short temper just causes me to snap and immediately start screaming at them like the inherently psychotic person I actually am.  But, I’ve been trying to control my anger lately.  During last week’s call, I actually started to quietly count to 10 to control my rage.  Unfortunately, due to the caller saying “Hello… hello… sir?” I only made it to 5.  As calmly as I could, I informed him that I was aware of his ruse, then urged him to end his own life of lying to others and leeching off of them, and politely asked him to never call us back again.

With today’s caller, I decided to play along for my own amusement.  He’ll be calling me back tomorrow, at which point I hope to bat him around like a cat with a mouse, abusing him as subtly and politely as possible, until the inevitable point that I stop wasting his time and mine and mercifully hang up.

So, with that said… I know someone, somewhere has to be wonder “Wow, Steven… you seem to have a lot of experience with these bottomfeeders.  How exactly does this scam work?”

Well I’m glad you asked.  Their MO is to call up and introduce themselves as either being a toner manufacturer or working with a manufacturer and ask if you are the person in charge of decision making on printing supplies.  They will then try to fish the make/model of printer you use, and inform you of what a great deal they can give you.  Often they’re willing to send a demo that you just send back if you’re not completely satisfied.  Sounds great, right?

If you pay them for the one you received, they try to tell you that by doing so you accepted your contract for 12 more cartridges.  The cartridges themselves are dirt cheap, usually half the price of retail.  The shipping on them, however, is not.  They often charge $70+ per cartridge for shipping, and it usually drives the cost over retail.  Oh but they’re so kind, and they’re willing to break the invoice down into more managable payments to help you out (and mask their sales tactics).

In short, don’t give these scumsuckers the time of day.  Cuss them out, urge them towards quitting their job or suicide, toy with them like a cat with a mouse, or just hang up.  Cold-calling toner salesmen are BAD NEWS!

The FTC has a web page about avoiding toner scams and how to report them.

Time to break out the old Iris Indigo or Indy2?!

Nerd stuff, Photography | Posted by steven
Jun 02 2008

I received a copy of CDW‘s IT magazine “Biztech” today in the mail and started flipping through it.  I noticed on page 17 there’s a review of the ATI FireGL V5600 card.  On page 18, there’s a beautiful picture of a dual monitor setup in order to show off the capabilities of this card….

Click here for that beautiful picture.

Now, do we see a problem here?  Either it’s time for me to break out one of my old SGI workstations because ATI has at long long last released an up-to-date video card, and of course drivers for it….. OR…. some lazy layout editor at CDW unknowingly used a picture that’s probably 15 years old depicting SGI’s Irix operating system running the 4Dwm window manager and some unknown CAD software instead of actually taking a picture of the product being reviewed.  If it wasn’t for Getty Images, what would lazy advertisers and editors do?!

And in the interest of disclosure, there’s a credit in the margin for Lester Lefkowitz/Getty Images.

Pest Patrol and I apparently define “spyware” differently

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Apr 30 2008

And apparently we also define “realtime” differently.  At work, our contract with Symantec for AV is about to end, so I’ve been seeing what else is out there since nobody seems to like the new Symantec Multi-Tier stuff.  So far, leading the pack, is CA’s eTrust Threat Manager.  It combines their AV software and Pest Patrol, their spyware scanner.  So, with my VM lab I set about testing by infecting.

I started with some screensavers.com crap.  They’re notorious for spyware.  Then I browsed to some known drive-by sites.  I loaded more and more junk, and PP never complained.  Doing a manual scan revealed quite a few entries, but realtime protection never worked.  Eventually I just tried to see how much crap I could possibly load up on a PC before it died a horrible and painful death.

The end result of that was iexplorer.exe consuming almost 180 megs of RAM just sitting on the opening screen.  And in all its glorious beauty…. BEHOLD!! <–  click that to see a big picture :P

So, I must say… I’m disappointed somewhat.  It seems to be a decent overall corporate package with nice centralized management and distribution…. but… the scan engine is lacking, to put it bluntly.  Thankfully I made a snapshot in VMWare before starting the spyware install process, and going back took less than 5 minutes :D

The boy who cried “Boy who cried wolf”

Nerd stuff | Posted by steven
Apr 28 2008

Let me first preface this post by saying… I am not a meteorologist.

I AM NOT A METEOROLOGIST.

Now, here’s a picture.

This is what’s called a “hook echo.” It’s one of the telltale signs of a tornado in a storm system. As forecasting tools become more accurate and more advanced, and as scientists just generally learn more about weather, tornadoes, and how to predict them… things like this become possible. But I have to ask… “is it too possible?”

As a child growing up, I was terrified of thunderstorms. I spent most of my summer at my grandmother’s house, where she had one of those NOAA Weather Radios that would turn on automatically if an advisory were issued. I was gripped with fear any time I would hear that horrible “siren” sound as it sprung to life and began broadcasting with its early (and still unchanged) computer voice. I would scramble to turn on the TV so I could watch the news and see the doppler radar of our impending doom. And I can’t tell you how many times I heard the TV meteorologists repeat their saying.

A watch means conditions are favorable for the formation of a tornado. A warning means that a tornado has formed and been spotted, and you should take shelter immediately.

Watches were issued, both for tornadoes and severe thunderstorms, often before the first drop of rain or first gust of wind had ever hit us. It just mean that there was a good chance that bad things were coming our way. A warning, on the other hand, signaled quite clearly; “Bad shit is coming… hide now!”

But now, a warning has lost its meaning. A line of storms rolled through the Charlotte area today, and that wonderful screeching siren and computer voice broke in while I was listening to NPR at lunch. What it said this time was different from what I remember as a child. It said that a warning had been issued, and that meant conditions were favorable for the formation of a tornado. What? Favorable? Warning means “HIDE NOW!”… not “favorable”.

And I’ve seen a lot of these warnings on the news lately. We’ve had some decent thunderstorms in the past month or two, and all of them seem to have spawned at least one tornado warning somewhere in the area. Now that I know they’re being called out as “conditions are favorable” rather than “yup, we done seen it”… I understand why. But that brings me back to my original point. Are all the false alarms going to desensitize people to the whole ordeal? Are we going to get to a point where a warning is just as mundane and just as ignored as a watch? And if we do, is that going to put people at risk in the chance that they choose to ignore what turns out to be a valid warning? Why create a warning based on technology that seems to be getting it wrong far more than getting it right?

Don’t get me wrong, I love technology, and I’m always amazed at what can be done with it as far as weather is concerned. Whenever we have a storm in the area, the first thing I do is hit up Weather Underground, watch a time loop, and see when it might be coming our way. I saw the bow echo in today’s radar that probably led to today’s warnings in it for myself. (Can you find it?) I think I have a decent idea of how tornadoes form, and how meteorologists look for wind shear and certain shapes in the radar to make their predictions… but I still believe they need to be more conservative in issuing tornado warnings.

Any meteorologists out there in the world care to chime in?

Wikipedia’s Cloud of Smug

Nerd stuff, Uncategorized | Posted by steven
Apr 11 2008

After a recent incident on Wikipedia involving the deletion of an article about NASIOC, I have come to see a whole new side of it. Any respect I had for Wikipedia has pretty much been flushed down the toilet lately.

One argument was brought up during the request for deletion that:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It isn’t myspace.

I would disagree with that. After seeing the “back end” of Wikipedia… where these disputes arise and are settled, I think it’s precisely like Myspace. The side that most people see is an encyclopedia… a gathering of information. However on the back side, it seems to be a clique of users who make it into their own little social networking site. A look at user profiles shows “barnstars”, awards, cute little banners about the editor, and other silly stuff you’d expect to find on MySpace, Facebook, or any other social networking site. There are cliques and groups and cabals. It’s even an MMORPG. And from the outside, it gives the impression of a closed society, run by a bunch of insecure nerds who were bullied as children and are looking to wield whatever power they can.

I’ve always thought an online encyclopedia, not bound by the rules of print and the logistics of print distribution, should be inclusionist by nature. Anything and everything should appear in it, as a jumping off source to valid information. But, in the last few days, it appears many of the admins are exclusionary, and prone to delete anything they don’t like and don’t agree with. Of course, they have plenty of rules to back up their cherrypicking. And as always, there are even rules to contradict their rules!

So I wish Wikipedia the best in its ventures. If this is how the site is run, it is doomed to eventual failure. In the meantime, enjoy sniffing your own farts, and the farts of other admins… and I wish to issue the Barnstar of Exclusionism and Mediocrity to all of you brave souls who tirelessly delete and debate what others have created.